Provisions are determined on the best estimates required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date. Dependingon the nature of the underlying obligation, provisions will be discounted to its present value. These are reviewed at eachbalance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimates.
A contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events whose existence will be confirmed by the occurrenceor non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events beyond the control of the Company or a present obligationthat is not recognized because it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation. Acontingent liability also arises in extremely rare cases where there is a liability that cannot be recognized because it cannotbe measured reliably. The Company does not recognize a contingent liability but discloses its existence in the standalonefinancial statements.
The Company measures financial instruments, such as, derivatives at fair value at each balance sheet date.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction betweenmarket participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transactionto sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:
• In the principal market for the asset or liability, or
• In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricingthe asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economicbenefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the assetin its highest and best use.
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are availableto measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the standalone financial statements are categorisedwithin the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuemeasurement as a whole:
• Level 1 — Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
• Level 2 — Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement isdirectly or indirectly observable
• Level 3 — Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurementis unobservable
For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the standalone financial statements on a recurring basis, the Companydetermines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on thelowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period.
For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Company has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of thenature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy as explained above (Refernote 39).
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equityinstrument of another entity.
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial assets are classified, at initial recognition, as subsequently measured at amortised cost, fair value through othercomprehensive income (OCI), and fair value through profit or loss.
However, trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are measured at transaction price.
The classification of financial assets at initial recognition depends on the financial asset’s contractual cash flow characteristicsand the Company’s business model for managing them.
I n order for a financial asset to be classified and measured at amortised cost or fair value through OCI, it needs to give riseto cash flows that are ‘solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI)’ on the principal amount outstanding. This assessmentis referred to as the SPPI test and is performed at an instrument level.
The Company makes an assessment of the objective of the business model in which a financial asset is held at a portfolio levelbecause this best reflects the way the business is managed and information is provided to management. The informationconsidered includes:
• The stated policies and objectives for the portfolio and the operation of those policies in practice. These includewhether management’s strategy focuses on earning contractual interest income, maintaining a particular interest rateprofile, matching the duration of the financial assets to the duration of any related liabilities or expected cash outflowsor realising cash flows through the sale of the assets;
• How the performance of the portfolio is evaluated and reported to the Company's management;
• The risks that affect the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held within that business model)and how those risks are managed;
• How managers of the business are compensated - e.g. whether compensation is based on the fair value of the assetsmanaged or the contractual cash flows collected; and
• The frequency, volume and timing of sales of financial assets in prior periods, the reasons for such sales and expectationsabout future sales activity.
Transfers of financial assets to third parties in transactions that do not qualify for derecognition are not considered salesfor this purpose, consistent with the Company's continuing recognition of the asset.
A ‘debt instrument’ is measured at the amortised cost if both the following conditions are met:
• The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows, and
• Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal andinterest (SPPI) on the principal amount outstanding.
After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interestrate (EIR) method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees orcosts that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included in finance income in the profit or loss. The lossesarising from impairment are recognised in the profit or loss. This category generally applies to trade and other receivables.
All equity investments in scope of Ind AS 109 are measured at fair value. Equity instruments which are held for trading andcontingent consideration recognised by an acquirer in a business combination to which Ind AS 103 applies are classified as atFVTPL. For all other equity instruments, the Company may make an irrevocable election to present in other comprehensiveincome subsequent changes in the fair value. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis.The classification is made on initial recognition and is irrevocable.
I f the Company decides to classify an equity instrument as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument,excluding dividends, are recognized in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to P&L, even on sale ofinvestment. However, the Company may transfer the cumulative gain or loss within equity.
Equity instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognized in the P&L.De-recognition
A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a Company of similar financial assets) is primarilyderecognised (i.e. removed from the Company’s standalone balance sheet) when:
• The rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired, or
• The Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay thereceived cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’ arrangement; and either (a) theCompany has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) the Company has neither transferrednor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
When the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset or has entered into a pass-througharrangement, it evaluates if and to what extent it has retained the risks and rewards of ownership. When it has neithertransferred nor retained substantially all of the risks and rewards of the asset, nor transferred control of the asset, theCompany continues to recognise the transferred asset to the extent of the Company’s continuing involvement. In that case,the Company also recognises an associated liability. The transferred asset and the associated liability are measured on abasis that reflects the rights and obligations that the Company has retained.
Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of the originalcarrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of consideration that the Company could be required to repay.
In accordance with Ind-AS 109, the Company applies expected credit loss (ECL) model for measurement and recognitionof impairment loss on the following financial assets and credit risk exposure:
• Financial assets that are debt instruments, and are measured at amortised cost e.g., loans, deposits, trade receivablesand bank balance;
• Trade receivables or any contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset that result from transactions.
The Company follows ‘simplified approach’ for recognition of impairment loss allowance on trade receivables or contractrevenue receivables.
The application of simplified approach does not require the Company to track changes in credit risk. Rather, it recognisesimpairment loss allowance based on lifetime ECLs at each reporting date, right from its initial recognition.
For recognition of impairment loss on other financial assets, the Company determines that whether there has been asignificant increase in the credit risk since initial recognition. If credit risk has not increased significantly, 12-month ECL isused to provide for impairment loss. However, if credit risk has increased significantly, lifetime ECL is used. If, in a subsequentperiod, credit quality of the instrument improves such that there is no longer a significant increase in credit risk since initialrecognition, then the entity reverts to recognising impairment loss allowance based on 12-month ECL.
Lifetime ECL are the expected credit losses resulting from all possible default events over the expected life of a financialinstrument. The 12-month ECL is a portion of the lifetime ECL which results from default events that are possible within12 months after the reporting date.
ECL is the difference between all contractual cash flows that are due to the Company in accordance with the contract andall the cash flows that the entity expects to receive (i.e., all cash shortfalls), discounted at the original EIR. When estimatingthe cash flows, an entity is required to consider:
• All contractual terms of the financial instrument (including prepayment, extension, call and similar options) over theexpected life of the financial instrument. However, in rare cases when the expected life of the financial instrumentcannot be estimated reliably, then the entity is required to use the remaining contractual term of the financial instrument;
• Cash flows from the sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.
As a practical expedient, the Company uses a provision matrix to determine impairment loss allowance on portfolio of itstrade receivables. The provision matrix is based on its historically observed default rates over the expected life of the tradereceivables and is adjusted for forward-looking estimates. At every reporting date, the historical observed default rates areupdated and changes in the forward-looking estimates are analysed.
ECL impairment loss allowance (or reversal) recognized during the period is recognized as income/ expense in the statementof profit and loss (P&L). This amount is reflected under the head ‘other expenses’ in the P&L. The balance sheet presentationfor various financial instruments is described below:
• Financial assets measured as at amortised cost, contractual revenue receivables and lease receivables: ECL is presentedas an allowance, i.e., as an integral part of the measurement of those assets in the balance sheet. The allowance reducesthe net carrying amount. Until the asset meets write-off criteria, the Company does not reduce impairment allowancefrom the gross carrying amount;
• Loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts: ECL is presented as a provision in the balance sheet, i.e. asa liability;
• Debt instruments measured at FVTOCI: Since financial assets are already reflected at fair value, impairment allowanceis not further reduced from its value. Rather, ECL amount is presented as ‘accumulated impairment amount’ in the OCI.
For assessing increase in credit risk and impairment loss, the Company combines financial instruments on the basis of sharedcredit risk characteristics with the objective of facilitating an analysis that is designed to enable significant increases in creditrisk to be identified on a timely basis.
Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, loans andborrowings, payables, or as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings and payables, net ofdirectly attributable transaction costs.
The Company’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables and lease liabilities.
The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification, as described below:
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the EIRmethod. Gains and losses are recognised in profit and loss when the liabilities are derecognised as well as through the EIRamortisation process.
Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are anintegral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the statement of profit and loss.
Financial guarantee contracts issued by the Company are those contracts that require a payment to be made to reimbursethe holder for a loss it incurs because the specified debtor fails to make a payment when due in accordance with the termsof a debt instrument. Financial guarantee contracts are recognised initially as a liability at fair value, adjusted for transactioncosts that are directly attributable to the issuance of the guarantee. Subsequently, the liability is measured at the higher ofthe amount of loss allowance determined as per impairment requirements of Ind AS 109 and the amount recognised lesscumulative amortisation.
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. When anexisting financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms ofan existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the de-recognition of theoriginal liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in thestatement of profit and loss.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the balance sheet if there is a currentenforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise theassets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
Cash and cash equivalent in the balance sheet comprise cash at banks and on hand and short-term deposits with an originalmaturity of three months or less, which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
For the purpose of the cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term deposits.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholdersby the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period. For the purpose of calculating dilutedearnings per share, the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average numberof shares outstanding during the period are adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential equity shares.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision¬maker (CODM). The CODM, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operatingsegments, has been identified as the Corporate Management Committee.
Segments are organised based on business which have similar economic characteristics as well as exhibit similarities innature of products and services offered, the nature of production processes, the type and class of customer and distribution
methods. Segment revenue arising from third party customers is reported on the same basis as revenue in the financialstatements. Inter-segment revenue is reported on the basis of transactions which are primarily market led.
Segment results represent profits before finance charges, unallocated corporate expenses and taxes. “Unallocated CorporateExpenses” include revenue and expenses that relate to initiatives /costs attributable to the enterprise as a whole and arenot attributable to segments.
The Company recognises a liability to make cash or non-cash distributions to equity holders of the Company when thedistribution is authorised, and the distribution is no longer at the discretion of the Company. As per the corporate laws inIndia, a distribution is authorised when it is approved by the shareholders. A corresponding amount is recognised directlyin equity.
Non-cash distributions are measured at the fair value of the assets to be distributed with fair value re-measurementrecognised directly in equity.
Upon distribution of non-cash assets, any difference between the carrying amount of the liability and the carrying amountof the assets distributed is recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
Investment in Subsidiaries and Associate are carried at cost in the separate financial statements as permitted under Ind AS27. These investments are assessed for impairment in the manner outlined in Note 2.3(g).
The Company classifies non-current assets and disposal groups as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recoveredprincipally through a sale rather than through continuing use.
Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount andfair value less costs to sell. Costs to sell are the incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset (disposalgroup), excluding finance costs and income tax expense.
The criteria for held for sale classification is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable, and the asset or disposalgroup is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Actions required to complete the sale/ distribution shouldindicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the sale will be made or that the decision to sell will be withdrawn.Management must be committed to the sale and the sale expected within one year from the date of classification.
For these purposes, sale transactions include exchanges of non-current assets for other non-current assets when theexchange has commercial substance. The criteria for held for sale classification is regarded met only when the assets ordisposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to terms that are usual and customaryfor sales of such assets (or disposal groups), its sale is highly probable; and it will genuinely be sold, not abandoned. TheCompany treats sale of the asset or disposal group to be highly probable when:
• The appropriate level of management is committed to a plan to sell the asset (or disposal group),
• An active programme to locate a buyer and complete the plan has been initiated (if applicable),
• The asset (or disposal group) is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its currentfair value,
• The sale is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification, and
• Actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made orthat the plan will be withdrawn.
Property, plant and equipment and intangible are not depreciated, or amortised assets once classified as held for sale. Assetsand liabilities classified as held for sale are presented separately from other items in the balance sheet.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) notifies new standards or amendments to the existing standards under Companies(Indian Accounting Standards) Rules as issued from time to time. For the year ended March 31, 2025, MCA has notifiedInd AS - 117 Insurance Contracts and amendments to Ind AS 116 - Leases, relating to sale and leaseback transactions,applicable to the Company with effect from April 1, 2024. The Company has reviewed the new pronouncements and basedon its evaluation has determined that it does not have any significant impact in its financial statements.
The Board of Directors at its meeting held on September 05, 2024, approved a proposal to buyback up to 702,439 equityshares of the Company for an aggregate amount not exceeding '7,200 lakhs, being 24.85% and 24.98% of the aggregate ofthe total paid-up equity share capital and free reserves of the Company based on the audited standalone and consolidatedfinancial statements respectively as at March 31, 2024, at a price not exceeding '1,025 per equity share subject to approvalfrom shareholders. Subsequently, on October 11, 2024 the shareholders approved the buyback of equity shares and onOctober 15, 2024, the buyback committee of the Board of Directors approved the final buyback price of '1,025. The recorddate for determining the buyback entitlement was determined to be October 25, 2024 and the tendering period for thebuyback commenced from October 30, 2024 to November 06, 2024. The Company completed the buyback of shares byNovember 12, 2024 and extinguished the shares by November 18, 2024. The Company incurred '142 lakhs as expensestowards buyback of equity shares and accounted it as reduction from the equity during the year ended March 31, 2025.
(a) Securities premium
The amount received in excess of the face value of equity shares has been classified as securities premium. This reserveis utilised in accordance with Section 52 of Companies Act, 2013.
Retained earnings represent the amount of accumulated earnings of the Company as on balance sheet date.
The share options outstanding account is used to record the fair value of equity-settled, share-based paymenttransactions with employees. The amounts recorded in share options outstanding account are transferred to securitiespremium upon exercise of stock options and transferred to the retained earnings account to the extent of stock optionsvested and not exercised by employees.
In accordance with Section 69 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Company creates capital redemption reserve equalto the nominal value of the shares bought back as an appropriation from the retained earnings. The reserve is utilisedin accordance with Section 69 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Notes:
(a) Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF): During the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company received a demand orderfrom Regional Commissioner of Provident Fund, on account of non- inclusion of various allowances for the calculationof Provident Fund (PF) contribution for the period April 2012 to May 2014, which was disputed by the Company.Pending conclusion of the related proceedings, the Honourable Supreme Court issued an order dated February 28,2019, in a matter similar to the case involving the Company as detailed above. Subsequently, during the year 2019¬20, the Company received demand order from PF Recovery Officer to pay ' 163 lakhs to the respective employee PFaccounts or by way of Demand Draft (DD) in favour of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner. The Company duringthe year 2019-20, obtained an interim stay on this demand. The Company has paid '163 lakhs of the demand and' 8 lakhs of interest under protest. Company has also further remitted an additional demand of ' 10 lakhs for penalty.
There are numerous interpretative issues relating to this Supreme Court judgement. The Company based on legaladvice received and management’s evaluation and best estimate, had made a provision for the demand amount of' 163 lakhs and for an interest of ' 73 lakhs. As a matter of prudence, the Company has also provided for ' 20 lakhsfor further periods. Based on evaluation of the Supreme Court order, the management has determined that theposition followed by it for periods subsequent to the demand (as above), i.e. from May 2014 is appropriate. Overallthe Company has accounted for a total provision is ' 256 lakhs as at March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024. TheCompany has created the above provision without prejudice to its legal rights under the Employees Provident Fundand Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Based on legal advice obtained and management assessment in this regard, no provision is deemed necessary towardsinterest and penalty on PF demanded for employees whose details are not identifiable and with respect to the penaltyfor employees, whose details are identifiable. Accordingly, interest obligation of ' 63 lakhs and damages for ' 153lakhs respectively are disclosed as contingent liabilities as at March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024 (refer note 36(c)).
(b) Service tax: The Company received a demand order of ' 350 lakhs along with interest and penalty from Commissionerof Service Tax for non-payment of service tax on certain services made during the period FY 2008-09 to 2012-13.While the liability has been confirmed by the Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax, the Company disputes the sameand has filed appeal with Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) and has deposited ' 26 lakhstowards statutory pre-deposit for filing appeal. As a matter of prudence, the Company has provided ' 14 lakhs forservice tax demand, ' 35 lakhs for interest upto FY 2023-24 and an additional amount of ' 2 lakhs during FY 2024-25.Overall the Company has accounted for a total provision is ' 51 lakhs as at March 31, 2025. Based on evaluation of thetechnical position as well as legal advice obtained from experts, the management believes that the ultimate outcomeof this proceedings would be favourable. Accordingly, the Company has disclosed the balance demand amount of' 336 lakhs and interest and penalty aggregating to ' 1,103 lakhs as contingent liability. (refer note 36(c)).
Information about the Company's performance obligations are summarised below:
The performance obligation is satisfied over the period of subscription ranging from 1 to 12 months and the paymentis collected upfront.
Marriage services & others consist of WeddingBazaar services, Mandap services, Astrology services and new initiativeslaunched during the current year which include Many Jobs and Wedding Loans.
The primary performance obligation under Wedding bazaar services contract is satisfied over the period ofsubscription and the payment is collected upfront. The Company also charges a fixed fee for other servicesprovided under the contract for which the performance obligation is satisfied over the period of the contract.There are no significant financing component in these contracts.
The primary performance obligation under Mandap services contract is satisfied over the period of subscriptionand the payment is collected upfront. There are no significant financing component in these contracts.
The primary performance obligation under Astrology services contract is satsified at the point of time whenthe service is provided. The payment is collected upfront. There are no significant financing component inthese contracts.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Ind AS requires the Company’s management to make judgements,estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognised in the financial statements thatare not readily apparent from other sources. The judgements, estimates and associated assumptions are based on historicalexperience and other factors including estimation of effects of uncertain future events that are considered to be relevant.Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis. Revisions to accounting estimates (accountedon a prospective basis) are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period,or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. The following arethe critical judgements and estimations that have been made by the management in the process of applying the Company’saccounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements and/or keysources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that may have a significant risk of causing a materialadjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year.
In the process of applying the Company's accounting policies, management has made the following judgements, whichhave the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.
When the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the balance sheet cannot be measuredbased on quoted prices in active markets, their fair value is measured using valuation techniques including theDCF model. The inputs to these models are taken from observable markets where possible, but where this isnot feasible, a degree of judgement is required in establishing fair values. Judgements include considerations ofinputs such as liquidity risk, credit risk and volatility. Changes in assumptions about these factors could affect thereported fair value of financial instruments. See Note 40 for further disclosures.
The Company has entered into leases for office premises, branches and retail outlets. The Company determinesthe lease term as the non-cancellable term of the lease, together with any periods covered by an option to extendthe lease if it is reasonably certain to be exercised, or any periods covered by an option to terminate the lease,if it is reasonably certain not to be exercised.
The Company has several lease contracts that include extension and termination options. The Company appliesjudgement in evaluating whether it is reasonably certain whether or not to exercise the option to renew orterminate the lease. That is, it considers all relevant factors that create an economic incentive for it to exerciseeither the renewal or termination. After the commencement date, the Company reassesses the lease term if thereis a significant event or change in circumstances that is within its control and affects its ability to exercise or notto exercise the option to renew or to terminate.
The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date,that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within thenext financial year, are described below. The Company based its assumptions and estimates on parameters availablewhen these financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments,however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising that are beyond the control of the Company.Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.
(i) Taxes
Determining of income tax liabilities using tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantially enactedrequires the management to estimate the level of tax that will be payable based upon the Company’s / expert’sinterpretation of applicable tax laws, relevant judicial pronouncements and an estimation of the likely outcomeof any open tax assessments including litigations or closures thereof.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will beavailable against which the deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses, unabsorbed depreciation andunused tax credits could be utilized.
In respect of other taxes which are in disputes, the management estimates the level of tax that will be payablebased upon the Company’s / expert’s interpretation of applicable tax laws, relevant judicial pronouncements andan estimation of the likely outcome of any open tax assessments including litigations or closures thereof.
Impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount,which is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. The fair value less costs ofdisposal calculation is based on available data from binding sales transactions, conducted at arm’s length, forsimilar assets or observable market prices less incremental costs for disposing of the asset. The value in usecalculation is based on a DCF model. The cash flows are derived from the budget for the next five years and donot include restructuring activities that the Company is not yet committed to or significant future investmentsthat will enhance the asset’s performance of the CGU being tested. The recoverable amount is sensitive to thediscount rate used for the DCF model as well as the expected future cash-inflows and the growth rate used forextrapolation purposes. These estimates are most relevant to goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite usefullives recognised by the Company.
The cost of the defined benefit gratuity plan and the present value of the gratuity obligation are determinedusing actuarial valuation. An actuarial valuation involves making various assumptions that may differ from actualdevelopments in the future. These include the determination of the discount rate, future salary increases andmortality rates. Due to the complexities involved in the valuation and its long-term nature, a defined benefitobligation is highly sensitive to changes in these assumptions. All assumptions are reviewed at each reportingdate. Further details about gratuity obligations are disclosed in Note 35.
Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determination of the most appropriatevaluation model, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimation requiresdetermination of the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the shareoption, volatility and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. The Black-Scholes valuation model hasbeen used by the management for share-based payment transactions. The assumptions and models used forestimating fair value for share-based payment transactions are disclosed in Note 34.
The management has estimated the useful life of its property, plant and equipment based on technical assessment.The estimate has been supported by independent assessment by internal technical experts and review ofhistory of asset usage. The management believes that these estimated useful lives are realistic and reflect fairapproximation of the period over which the assets are likely to be used.
(vi) Leases - estimating the incremental borrowing rate
The Company cannot readily determine the interest rate implicit in the lease, therefore, it uses its incrementalborrowing rate (IBR) to measure lease liabilities. The IBR is the rate of interest that the Company would have topay to borrow over a similar term, and with a similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similarvalue to the right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment. The IBR therefore reflects what the Company‘would have to pay’, which requires estimation when no observable rates are available or when they need to beadjusted to reflect the terms and conditions of the lease. The Company estimates the IBR using observable inputs(such as market interest rates) when available and is required to make certain entity-specific estimates.
Employee stock option scheme
On October 13, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the Employee Stock Option Scheme for providing stock options toits employees (“ESOS 2010”). The said scheme has been subsequently amended and renamed as Employee Stock OptionScheme 2014 (“ESOS 2014” or “Scheme”) vide resolution passed in the Board Meeting dated April 7, 2014. The fair valueof the employee share options has been measured using the Black-Scholes formula. The Scheme has also been approved byExtra-Ordinary General Meeting of the members of the Company held on November 19, 2010 and April 11, 2014, notingthe approval accorded to the original Scheme and the subsequent amendments respectively. The Scheme is administeredby the Nomination and Remuneration Committee of the Board. The details of Scheme are given below:
As per the Scheme, the options can be exercised within a period of 5 years from the date of vesting.
The expense recognised (net of reversal) for share options during the year is '35 lakhs (March 31, 2024: '32 lakhs). Thereare no cancellations or modifications to the awards in March 31, 2025 or March 31, 2024.
During the year, the Company has recognised ' 641 lakhs (March 31, 2024 - ' 654 lakhs) as contribution to providentfund and other funds in the statement of profit and loss (included in contribution to provident and other funds inNote 24).
Each employee is eligible to get one day earned leave for each completed month of service but entitlement arises onlyon completion of first year of service. Encashment of entitled leave is allowed only on separation subject to maximumaccumulation of up to 24 days.
Gratuity:
The Company has a defined benefit gratuity plan. Every employee who has completed five years or more of service getsgratuity on departure at 15 days salary (last drawn salary at the time of retirement, death or termination of employment)for each completed year of service subject to a maximum of ' 20 lakhs. The plan assets are in the form of corporate bondsand money market funds in the name of "Matrimony.com Limited Group Gratuity Trust" with Reliance Nippon Life InsuranceCompany Limited and deposits with Life Insurance Corporation of India.
Liabilities for the defined benefit plan are determined through an actuarial valuation as at March 31, 2025 using the"projected unit cost method".
The following tables summarise the components of net benefit expense recognised in the statement of profit and loss andthe funded status and the amount recognised in the balance sheet:
The Company had total cash outflows for leases of ' 2,023 lakhs in March 31, 2025 (' 1,824 lakhs in March 31, 2024).The Company also had non-cash additions to right-of-use assets of ' 1,946 lakhs (' 1,066 lakhs in March 31, 2024) andlease liabilities of ' 1,893 lakhs in March 31, 2025 (' 897 lakhs in March 31, 2024).
The Company has several lease contracts that include extension and termination options. These options are negotiatedby management to provide flexibility in managing the leased-asset portfolio and align with the Company's businessneeds. Management exercises significant judgement in determining whether these extension and termination options arereasonably certain to be exercised (see note 33).
As at March 31, 2025, the undiscounted potential future rental payments relating to periods following the exercise date ofextension options that are not expected to be exercised and not included in the lease term is ' Nil (As at March 31, 2024,' Nil).
Rental expense recorded for short-term leases was ' 168 lakhs and ' 89 lakhs for the year ended March 31, 2025 andMarch 31, 2024, respectively.
i) Matters wherein management has concluded the Company's liability to be probable have accordingly been providedfor in the books. Also, refer note 20.
ii) Matters wherein management has concluded the Company's liability to be possible have accordingly been disclosedunder this note.
iii) Matters wherein management is confident of succeeding in these litigations and have concluded the Company's liabilityto be remote. This is based on the relevant facts of judicial precedents and as advised by legal counsel which involvesvarious legal proceedings and claims, in different stages of process.
36 Commitment and contingencies (continued)
Note:
(i) (a) The Company received assessment orders from the Assessing Officer of Income tax for assessment years
2008-09 and 2009-10 with additions in relation to the disallowance of reimbursement of webhostingcharges and marketing expenses incurred by wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company on Company'sbehalf aggregating to ' 1,033 lakhs (demand amount of ' 319 lakhs), due to non-deduction of withholdingtaxes on the same. The Company received favourable orders from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) forAssessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, against which Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) hasfiled appeal with High Court. Based on the legal advice received from the consultants, the managementbelieves that the ultimate outcome of this proceedings would be favourable.
(b) The Company received assessment order from the Assessing Officer of Income tax for assessment year 2018¬19 with additions in relation to claiming CSR expenditure as deduction under Chapter VI-A and expenditureof employee stock options (ESOS), aggregating to ' 3 lakhs. The Company has filed an appeal against theorder with CIT(Appeals). Based on the legal advice received from the consultants, the management believesthat the ultimate outcome of this proceedings would be favourable.
(c) The Company received assessment order from the Assessing Officer of Income tax for assessmentyears 2020-21 with additions in relation to claiming CSR expenditure as deduction under Chapter VI-A,expenditure of employee stock options (ESOS), depreciation on intangible assets and bad debts written off,aggregating to ' 86 lakhs. The Company has filed an appeal against the order with CIT(Appeals). Based onthe legal advice received from the consultants, the management believes that the ultimate outcome of thisproceedings would be favourable.
(ii) Liabilities arising out of legal cases filed against the Company in various courts/ consumer redressal forums,consumer courts, disputed by the Company aggregates to ' 292 lakhs (March 31, 2024: ' 160 lakhs).
For management purposes, the Company’s operations are organised into two major segments - Matchmaking services andMarriage services.
Matchmaking services - The Company offers online matchmaking services on internet and mobile platforms. Matchmakingservices are delivered to users in India and the Indian diaspora through websites, mobile sites and mobile apps complementedby a wide on-the-ground network in India.
Marriage services & others - The Company offers marriage services consisting of WeddingBazaar services, Mandap servicesand Astrology services and others include new initiatives introduced during the current year which includes Many Jobs,Wedding Loan.
The Management Committee headed by Managing Director consisting of Chief Financial Officer and Heads of Departmentshave identified the above two reportable business segments. The committee monitors the operating results of its businessunits separately for the purpose of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment.
1) Considering the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) does not review segment assets and liabilities as the Marriageservices segment is significantly smaller compared to the Matchmaking segment and supplemented by the fact that theassets are interchangeably used between segments, the Company has decided to disclose only segment results.
2) Segment revenue, segment results, and other segment disclosures include the respective amounts identifiable to each ofthe segments as also amounts allocated on a reasonable basis. Those which are not allocable to a segment on reasonablebasis have been disclosed as "Unallocable".
3) The Company delivers matchmaking services to its users in India and the Indian diaspora through its websites, mobile sitesand mobile apps complemented by its on-the-ground network in India. Therefore revenue from none of the customersexceeds 10% of Company's total revenue.
Set out below, is a comparison by class of the carrying amounts and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, otherthan those with carrying amounts that are reasonable approximations of fair values. The management assessed that thecash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables, bank balances other than cash and cash equivalents, securitydeposits, other financial assets, loans, lease liabilities and other financial liabilities approximate their carrying amounts largelydue to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
The Company's principal financial liabilities, comprise trade and other financial liabilities. The main purpose of thesefinancial liabilities is to raise finance for the Company's operations. The Company has various financial assets such as tradereceivables, cash and cash equivalents, security deposits, investments, loans and bank balances other than cash and cashequivalents, which arise directly from its operations.
The Company is exposed to market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s senior management oversees themanagement of these risks. The Company’s senior management is supported by its Risk Committee that advises onfinancial risks and the appropriate financial risk governance framework for the Company. The Risk Committee providesassurance to the Company’s senior management that the Company’s financial risk activities are governed by appropriatepolicies and procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with the Company’spolicies and risk objectives. The Board of Directors reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks, which aresummarised below.
Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changesin market prices. Market risk comprises three types of risk: interest rate risk, currency risk and other price risk, such asequity price risk and commodity risk. Financial instruments affected by market risk include loans, trade payables, FVTPLinvestments and receivables.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changein market interest rates.
The Company does not have any credit facilities from any banks or financial institutions. As a result, changes in interestrates are not likely to substantially affect its business or results of operations.
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of an expense will fluctuate because of change inforeign exchange rates. The Company's exposure to the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates relates primarily to the
Company's operating activities (when revenue or expenses is denominated in a foreign currency) and the Company's netinvestment in foreign subsidiary.
The majority of the Company's revenue and expenses are in Indian Rupees, while a certain percentage of revenue isdenominated in US dollars. Based on Management's decision, the Company has not entered into foreign exchange forwardcontracts to cover its foreign exchange exposure. The Company monitors the exposure due to foreign currency fluctuationsand decides to hedge based on its internal policy.
The following table demonstrate the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in USD, AED and BDT exchange rates,with all other variables held constant. The Company’s exposure to foreign currency changes for all other currencies isnot material.
Credit risk is the risk that counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract,leading to a financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities and from its financing activities,including deposits with banks and financial institutions, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments. Inthe matchmaking segment, the Company collects the money upfront, hence there is no credit risk. With respect to marriageservices segment the Company collects only part of the consideration as an advance before the performance of services,thus exposed to credit risks. Credit quality of a customer cannot be assessed as the Company is largely in to Business toCustomer (B2C) model, however the Company through its established policy, procedures and control relating to credit riskmanagement manages the credit risk. An impairment analysis is performed at each reporting date and the Company has aprovisioning policy for making provision on receivables. The Company does not hold collateral as security.
Credit risk from balances with banks and financial institutions is managed by the Company’s treasury department inaccordance with the Company’s policy. Investments of surplus funds are made only with approved counterparties andwithin credit limits assigned to each counterparty so as to minimise concentration of risks and mitigate consequent financialloss. Counterparty credit limits are reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors on an annual basis, and may be updatedthroughout the year subject to approval of the Company’s Risk Committee. The limits are set to minimise the concentrationof risks and therefore mitigate financial loss through counterparty’s potential failure to make payments.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit riskwas ' 34,883 lakhs and '38,469 lakhs as at March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024 respectively, being the total of thecarrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, bank balances other than cash and cash equivalents, investment in mutualfunds, investment in tax free bonds, loans, security deposits, trade receivable and other financial assets excluding equityinvestments. Ageing of the credit impaired trade receivables is disclosed in note 11.
(i) The Company does not have any Benami property. No proceeding has been initiated or pending against the Companyfor holding any Benami property.
(ii) The Company has not advanced to or loaned to or invested funds in any other person(s) or entity(ies), including foreignentities (Intermediaries) with the understanding that such Intermediary shall:
(a) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or onbehalf of the Company (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or
(b) provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries
(iii) The Company has not received any fund from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (Funding Party)with the understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:
(a) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or onbehalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries); or
(b) provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries,
(iv) The Company does not have any transaction which is not recorded in the books of accounts that has been surrenderedor disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961 such as, search orsurvey or any other relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
(v) The Company has not been declared as a wilful defaulter as prescribed by Reserve Bank of India.
(vi) The Company has not traded or invested in crypto currency or virtual currency during the financial year.
(vii) The Company has not entered into any scheme of arrangement which has an accounting impact on current or previousfinancial year.
(viii) The Company has complied with the number of layers prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013.
(ix) The Company has not revalued its property, plant and equipment or intangible assets or both during the current orprevious year.
As at March 31, 2025, the Company is in the process of identifying and appointing a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) asrequired under Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements), 2015.
The Board of Directors, at its meeting held on May 16, 2025 have recommended a final dividend of 100% (' 5 per equityshare of face value of ' 5 each), subject to the approval of the shareholders.
Previous year figures have been reclassified / regrouped wherever necessary to conform to current year’s classification.
As per our report of even date.
For B S R & Co. LLP For and on behalf of the Board of Directors of Matrimony.com Limited
Chartered Accountants (L63090TN2001PLC047432)
ICAI Firm's Registration No.: 101248W/W-100022
K Sudhakar Murugavel Janakiraman S Vijayanand
Partner Chairman & Managing Director Company Secretary
Membership No: 214150 DIN: 00605009
Place: Chennai Place: Chennai Place: Chennai
Date: May 16, 2025 Date: May 16, 2025 Date: May 16, 2025