We have audited the accompanying Standalone Ind AS financialstatements of KIOCL Limited ("the Company") which comprisesthe Standalone Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2025, the StandaloneStatement of Profit and Loss (including Other ComprehensiveIncome), the Standalone Statement of Cash Flows for the yearthen ended and the Standalone Statement of Changes in Equityfor the year then ended, and Notes to the Standalone FinancialStatements, including material accounting policies and otherexplanatory information (herein after referred to as "StandaloneInd AS financial statements").
In our opinion and to the best of our information and accordingto the explanations given to us, the aforesaid Standalone Ind ASfinancial statements give the information required by the CompaniesAct, 2013 ("Act") in the manner so required and give a true and fairview in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribedunder section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with theCompanies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended,("Ind AS") and other accounting principles generally accepted inIndia, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March 2025, theLoss including Other Comprehensive Income, the changes in equityand its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
We conducted our audit of the Standalone Ind AS financialstatements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing (SAs)specified under section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013.Our responsibilities under those SAs are further described in theAuditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Ind ASFinancial Statements section of our report. We are independentof the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued bythe Institute of Chartered Accountants of India together with theethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the StandaloneInd AS financial statements under the provisions of the CompaniesAct, 2013 and the Rules there under, and we have fulfilled our otherethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements andthe Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we haveobtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for ouropinion on the Standalone Ind AS financial statements.
Attention is drawn to Note No. 3.1 along with foot note
thereto and Note No. 28.3.4 of the Standalone Ind AS financial
statements on the Kudremukh mine site from where iron orewas extracted by KIOCL Limited and has been suspended dueto the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2006 and all theassets located therein are either disposed of or transferred toPellet Plant. Owing to disputes relating to land and pendingissues on surrender of mines, the buildings in the townshipare reduced to 'NIL' value. The Company is of the view thatpending the decision of the Government of Karnataka, sinceLakhya dam therein is the main water source for the pelletplant, the asset continues to be shown under PPE.
The freehold land of 114.31 hectares together with movableassets located therein, has been proposed by the Companyto be handed over to Forest Department, Government ofKarnataka but the value of the land continues to be shownin the books of accounts pending the permission for suchhandover from Govt., of India.
Attention is drawn to Note No.1.10, Note No. 3.1 alongwith additional information thereto and Note No. 28.3.7 ofthe Standalone Ind AS financial statements on Blast FurnaceUnit (BFU) which is not in operation since 2009, since it is noteconomically viable in running the unit. As per the valuationreport provided by the Independent Valuer, the recoverableamount in each class of BFU are more than the carryingamount and hence, no impairment loss is recognised.
Attention is drawn to Note No. 3.3 along with additionalinformation thereto and Note No. 28.1.2 and Note No 28.2.5
The Company was allotted 52.87 Acres of land at Mangalorein 2008 for the purpose of building a Railway siding and17,483 Sq.mtrs at Doddaballapura in 2016 for the purpose ofsetting up an R & D Centre. As per the terms and conditionsof the agreement (leased land at Mangalore) the companywas supposed to start construction of the Railway sidingwithin 4 years from the date of allotment of land, failing whichthe Company would have to pay the difference in the costof the land from the date of allotment to the actual date ofconstruction. However, the company is in discussion with M/sKIADB for revising the entire lease agreement. As far as theLeased land at Doddaballapura, the company has written toKIADB for removing encroachments to enable them to usethe leased land which is yet to be done by KIADB.
The ultimate outcome of the matters is uncertain and thepositions taken by the management are based on theapplication of their best judgement, the Company is of the
view that pending the decision of the M/s KIADB, the assetcontinues to be shown under ROU.
Attention is drawn to Note No.1.6, Note No.1.9, Note No.4.1and Note No.28.3.5 in connection with Mining Rights shownin Note No.4.1 - "Mining Rights" under "Other intangibleAssets". The Mining Rights was reserved by GOK to theCompany during 2017. The Company had already obtainednecessary statutory clearances and also executed andregistered Lease deed in 2023 in this regard. This MiningRight was capitalized by the Company during 2023-24 after,satisfying the criteria set forth in the Accounting Standard IndAS 38 (Para 21) in that the said expenditure demonstrates thatthe expected future economic benefits that are attributableto the asset will flow to the company and that the cost of theasset could be measured reliably.
In this connection, reference is invited to the Note No.28.3.5,wherein the matters leading to Government of Karnatakanon execution of forest lease agreement, for handing over ofdiverted forest land to KIOCL for commencement of Miningactivities for which the Company during this year had alsofiled a Writ in the Karnataka High Court, seeking a directionto Forest Department (GOK) to execute the FLA enabling thecompany to commence its mining activities. Pending this, thecompany is yet to commence mining activities.
We draw reference to Note No.1.6, where it has been statedthat intangible assets are amortized over their respectiveestimated useful lives on a straight-line basis, from the datethat they are available for use and that as stated in NoteNo.1.9 that no amortization is charged on the Mining Rights,before the start of the commercial production, the MiningRights has not been amortized, as they are not available for
use and commercial production has not commenced for thereasons stated in the above para.
Attention is invited to Note No.28.3.15 on the stoppage ofPellet Plant during the year. The Company had shut downthe operations and received Job work for continuing theoperations, from December 2024.
We draw attention to Note 28.3.18 of the accompanyingStandalone Ind AS financial statements regarding theCompany not having independent directors as requiredunder the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and ListingRegulations so as to constitute its Audit Committee as ondate. As stated therein, these financial statements wereapproved by the Board of Directors of the Company.
The Company also does not have a Woman Director asrequired by the provisions of Companies Act, 2013.
Consequently, the Company has not complied with theprovisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and Listing Regulations.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of these matters.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professionaljudgement, were of most significance in our audit of theStandalone Ind AS financial statements of the current period.These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of theStandalone Ind AS financial statements as a whole, and in formingour opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion onthese matters. We have determined the matters described belowto be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
Sr.
Key Audit MatterNo.
How the matter was addressed in our audit
1. Property, Plant & Equipment (PPE), Capital Work inProgress (CWIP), Intangible Assets, and its impairment
There are areas where management judgement impacts thecarrying amount of property, plant and equipment, capitalwork in progress, intangible assets and their respectivedepreciation / amortization rates and impairment.
These include the nature, duration, estimated amount andamount incurred on project carried out, and decision to
Due to the materiality in the context of the balance sheet of theCompany in respect of PPE, CWIP, Intangibles and considering theage of the PPE of the Company, and the level of judgement andestimates required, we consider these to be as area of significance.
We assessed the controls in place over the PPE life cycle, evaluatedthe appropriateness of capitalization process, performed tests ofdetails on costs capitalized, the timeliness of the capitalization of theassets and de-recognition criteria for the assets retired from active
capitalize or expense costs; the annual asset life review;
use and its impairment.
the timeliness of the capitalization of the assets and the
We reviewed the policies for CWIP
use of the management assumptions and estimates for thedetermination or the measurement and recognition criteriafor assets retired from active use and its impairment.
Understanding and testing of design and operating effectiveness ofinternal controls in place related to approval process for capitalization.
Tested the control procedure for identification of cost incurred forspecific projects.
No.
Key Audit Matter
These amounts incurred on capital work in progress,capitalization and annual impairment test are consideredto be a key audit matter due to the complexity of theaccounting requirements and the significant judgementrequired in determining the key assumptions, includingestimates of future sales volumes and prices, operatingcosts, terminal value growth rates, capital expenditure andthe weighted-average cost of capital (discount rate), to beused to estimate the recoverable amount.
[Refer Note No. 2, 3.1,3.2, 4.1,4.2 & 28.3 to the StandaloneInd AS financial statements]
Performed substantive procedures on sample basis for amountscapitalised and amounts added to CWIP during the year.
Assessments made by management on the status of the projects andits future depending on balance work to be performed or approvalsto be received was also made.
Examined the disclosures made in respect of CWIP in compliancewith Ind AS-16 and Schedule III to the Companies Act 2013.
In performing these procedures, we reviewed the judgementsmade by the management including the nature of underlying costscapitalized; nature and amount in CWIP, determination of realizablevalue of the assets retired from active use; the appropriateness ofassets lives applied in the calculation of depreciation; the usefullives of the assets prescribed in Schedule II of Companies Act, 2013and the useful lives of certain assets as per the technical assessmentof management and its impairment. In case of realizable value forassets retired from active use, we have relied upon the independentvaluation report obtained by the management and provided to us.We've observed that the management has regularly reviewed theaforesaid judgments and there are no material changes.
2.
Adoption of Ind AS 116 Leases
The Company has adopted Ind AS 116 Leases. Theapplication and transition to this accounting standardis complex and is an area of focus in our audit since theCompany has a large number of leases with differentcontractual terms.
Ind AS 116 introduces a new lease accounting model,wherein lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use(ROU) asset and a lease liability arising from a lease on thebalance sheet. The lease liabilities are initially measured bydiscounting future lease payments during the lease term asper the contract / arrangement. Adoption of the standardinvolves significant judgements and estimates including,determination of the discount rates and the lease term.Additionally, the standard mandates detailed disclosures inrespect of transition.
[Refer Note No. 3.3, 13.2, 15.2 & 28.2.5 to the StandaloneInd AS financial statements]
Our audit procedures on adoption of Ind AS 116 include:
• Assessed and tested the process and controls in respect of thelease accounting standard (Ind AS 116);
• Assessed the Company's evaluation on the identification ofleases based on the contractual agreements and our knowledgeof the business;
• Evaluation of reasonableness of the discount rates applied indetermining the lease liabilities;
• On a sampling basis, we performed the following procedures:
a. Assessed the key terms and conditions of each lease withthe underlying lease contracts; and
b. Evaluated computation of lease liabilities and challengedthe key estimates such as, discount rates, escalation in leasepayments and the lease term.
• Assessed and tested the presentation and disclosurerelating to Ind AS 116
Based on the above audit procedures, the presentation anddisclosures in the Standalone Ind AS financial statements are inaccordance with the standard.
3.
Defined benefit obligation
The valuation of the retirement benefit schemes in theCompany is determined with reference to various actuarialassumptions including discount rate, rate of inflation andmortality rates. Due to the size of these schemes, smallchanges in these assumptions can have a material impacton the estimated defined benefit obligation.
We have examined the key controls over the process involvingmember data, formulation of assumptions and the financialreporting process in arriving at the provision for retirement benefits.We tested the controls for determining the actuarial assumptionsand the approval of those assumptions by senior management. Wefound these key controls were designed, implemented and operatedeffectively, and therefore determined that we could place reliance onthese key controls for the purposes of our audit.
[Refer Note No. 1.15, 14, 17 & 28.2.1 to the Standalone IndAS financial statements]
We tested the employee data used in calculating the obligation andwhere material, we also considered the treatment of curtailments,settlements, past service costs, re-measurements, benefits paid, andany other amendments made to obligations during the year. Fromthe evidence obtained, we found the data and assumptions usedby management in the actuarial valuations for retirement benefitobligations to be appropriate.
In this process, we have relied upon the valuation of 'actuary' inaccordance with SA 620 issued by the ICAI.
4.
Provisions and Contingent Liabilities
The Company has exposure towards litigations relating tovarious matters as set out in the Notes to the StandaloneInd AS Financial Statements.
Significant management judgement is required to assesssuch matters to determine the probability of occurrenceof material outflow of economic resources and whether aprovision should be recognized, or a disclosure should bemade. The management judgement is also supported withlegal advice in certain cases as considered appropriate.
As the ultimate outcome of the matters are uncertainand the positions taken by the management are basedon the application of their best judgement, related legaladvice including those relating to interpretation of laws/regulations, it is considered to be a Key Audit Matter.
[Refer Note No. 14, 17 & 28.1.2 to the Standalone Ind ASfinancial statements]
Our audit procedures in response to this matter included, amongothers,
• Understanding, assessing and testing the design and operatingeffectiveness of key controls surrounding assessment of litigationsrelating to the relevant laws and regulations;
• Discussion with the Management any material developmentsand latest status of legal matters;
• Evaluation of management's assessment around those mattersthat are not disclosed or not considered as contingent liability, asthe probability of material outflow is considered to be remote bythe management; and
• Review of adequacy of the disclosures in the notes to thefinancial statements.
Based on the above work performed, management's assessment inrespect of litigations and related disclosures relating to contingentliabilities/other significant litigations in the Standalone Ind ASFinancial Statements are considered to be reasonable.
5.
Inventory Management
The Company was majorly dependent on a single vendorfor procurement of raw material i.e., iron ore fines, requiredfor the production of its finished goods i.e., pellets.
This could have an impact on the uninterrupted productionprocess of the Company if the raw materials required werenot available on a timely basis as per the procurement orproduction schedule of the Company.
We observed that the Company was majorly dependent on a singlevendor for procurement of raw materials (iron ore fines) and duringthe year we observed that the production process was disruptedfor a considerable amount of time (Refer to Note No.28.3.15 to theStandalone Ind AS financial statements).
We were informed by the management that the Company is in theprocess of finding alternative source of raw material (Iron ore fines)from Odisha which require additional facilities in the manufacturingprocess like vertical pressure filter which has been capitalizedduring the year. We have relied upon the management replies anddocuments provided in this process.
KIOCL during the earlier year had obtained the second stageapprovals for mining in Devadari mines, Bellary district, therefore theirdependency on NMDC will be reduced in the coming financial years.
1. The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for thepreparation of the other information. The other informationcomprises the information included in the ManagementDiscussion and Analysis, Board's Report including Annexuresto Board's Report, Corporate Governance and Shareholder'sInformation, but does not include the Standalone Ind ASfinancial statements and our auditor's report thereon.
2. Our opinion on the Standalone Ind AS financial statementsdoes not cover the other information and we do not expressany form of assurance conclusion thereon.
3. In connection with our audit of the Standalone Ind AS financialstatements, our responsibility is to read the other informationand, in doing so, consider whether the other information ismaterially inconsistent with the Standalone Ind AS financialstatements, or our knowledge obtained during the courseof our audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude thatthere is a material misstatement of this other information, weare required to report that fact. We have nothing to reportin this regard.
1. The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for thematters stated in section 134(5) of the Companies Act 2013,with respect to the preparation of these Standalone IndAS financial statements that give a true and fair view of thefinancial position and financial performance, changes inequity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with theAccounting Principles generally accepted in India, includingthe Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified under section133 of the Act, read with relevant rules issued thereunder andother accounting principles generally accepted in India andin compliance with Regulation 33 of the Listing Regulations.This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequateaccounting records in accordance with the provisions ofthe Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and forpreventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities;selection and application of appropriate accounting policies;making judgements and estimates that are reasonable andprudent; and design, implementation and maintenance ofadequate internal financial controls, that were operatingeffectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness ofthe accounting records, relevant to the preparation andpresentation of the Standalone Ind AS financial statementsthat give a true and fair view and are free from materialmisstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
2. In preparing the Standalone Ind AS financial statements,management is responsible for assessing the Company'sability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and using thegoing concern basis of accounting unless management eitherintends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, orhas no realistic alternative but to do so.
3. The Board of Directors are responsible for overseeing theCompany's financial reporting process.
1. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance aboutwhether the Standalone Ind AS financial statements as awhole are free from material misstatement, whether due tofraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includesour opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurancebut is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordancewith SAs will always detect a material misstatement when itexists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and areconsidered material if, individually or in the aggregate, theycould reasonably be expected to influence the economicdecisions of users taken on the basis of these Standalone IndAS financial statements.
2. As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exerciseprofessional judgement and maintain professional scepticismthroughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatementof the Standalone Ind AS financial statements, whetherdue to fraud or error, design and perform auditprocedures responsive to those risks, and obtain auditevidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide abasis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a materialmisstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for oneresulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion,forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, orthe override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal controls relevant tothe audit in order to design audit procedures that areappropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Act, we are also responsible for expressing ouropinion on whether the Company has adequate internalfinancial controls system in place and the operatingeffectiveness of such controls.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policiesused and the reasonableness of accounting estimatesand related disclosures made by management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of management's useof the going concern basis of accounting and, basedon the audit evidence obtained, whether a materialuncertainty exists related to events or conditions thatmay cast significant doubt on the Company's abilityto continue as a going concern. If we conclude that
a material uncertainty exists, we are required to drawattention in our auditor's report to the related disclosuresin the Standalone Ind AS financial statements or, if suchdisclosure is inadequate, to modify our opinion. Ourconclusions are based on the audit evidence obtainedup to the date of our auditor's report. However, futureevents or conditions may cause the Company to ceaseto continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure andcontent of the Standalone Ind AS financial statements,including the disclosures, and whether the StandaloneInd AS financial statements represent the underlyingtransactions and events in a manner that achievesfair presentation.
3. We communicate with those charged with governanceregarding, among other matters, the planned scope andtiming of the audit and significant audit findings, includingany significant deficiencies in internal control that we identifyduring our audit.
4. We also provide those charged with governance with astatement that we have complied with relevant ethicalrequirements regarding independence, and to communicatewith them all relationships and other matters that mayreasonably be thought to bear on our independence, andwhere applicable, related safeguards.
5. From the matters communicated with those charged withgovernance, we determine those matters that were of mostsignificance in the audit of the Standalone Ind AS financialstatements of the current period and are therefore the keyaudit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor'sreport unless law or regulation precludes public disclosureabout the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances,we determine that a matter should not be communicatedin our report because the adverse consequences of doingso would reasonably be expected to outweigh the publicinterest benefits of such communication.
1. As required under the directions, specific directions andsub-directions issued by the Comptroller and AuditorGeneral of India in terms of Sub-section (5) of Section 143of the Companies Act 2013, we are enclosing our reportin "Annexure A".
2. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2020("the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India interms of sub- section (11) of section 143 of the CompaniesAct, 2013, we give in the "Annexure B" a statement on thematters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to theextent applicable our report.
5. A. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
(a) We have sought and obtained all the informationand explanations which to the best of ourknowledge and belief were necessary for thepurposes of our audit.
(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as requiredby law have been kept by the Company so far as itappears from our examination of those books.
(c) The Standalone Balance Sheet, the StandaloneStatement of Profit and Loss (Including OtherComprehensive Income), the StandaloneStatement of Changes in Equity and the StandaloneStatement of Cash Flows dealt with by this reportare in agreement with the books of account.
(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid Standalone Ind ASfinancial statements comply with the AccountingStandards (Ind AS) specified under section 133of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies(Accounts) Rules, 2014, Companies (IndianAccounting Standards) Rules, 2015, as amended;
(e) As per notification number G.S.R. 463(E) dated5th June, 2015 issued by Ministry of CorporateAffairs, section 164(2) of the Act regarding thedisqualifications of Directors is not applicable tothe Company, since it is a Government Company;
(f) The modifications relating to the maintenanceof accounts and other matters connectedtherewith are as stated in the paragraph 3.A(b)above on reporting under Section 143(3)(b) ofthe Act and paragraph 3.B(f) below on reportingunder Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit andAuditors) Rules, 2014.
(g) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financialcontrols over financial reporting of the Companyand the operating effectiveness of such controls,refer to our separate report in "Annexure C".
(h) As per notification number G.S.R. 463 (E) dated 5thJune 2015 issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs,section 197 of the Act regarding remuneration todirector is not applicable to the Company, since itis a Government Company;
B. With respect to the other matters to be included inthe Auditor's Report in accordance with Rule 11 ofthe Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, inour opinion and to the best of our information andaccording to the explanations given to us:
(a) The Company has disclosed the impact of pendinglitigations on its financial position in its StandaloneInd AS financial statements. Refer Note No. 28.1.2of the Standalone Ind AS financial statements.
(b) The Company did not have any long-termcontracts including derivative contracts for whichthere were any material foreseeable losses.
(c) There has been no delay in transferring amounts,required to be transferred, to the InvestorEducation and Protection Fund by the Company.
(d) (i) The management has represented that, to
the best of its knowledge and belief, no fundshave been advanced or loaned or invested(either from borrowed funds or share premiumor any other sources or kind of funds) by thecompany to or in any other person or entity,including foreign entity ("Intermediary"),with the understanding, whether recordedin writing or otherwise, that the Intermediaryshall, whether, directly or indirectly lend orinvest in other persons or entities identifiedin any manner whatsoever by or on behalfof the company ("Ultimate Beneficiaries") orprovide any guarantee, security or the like onbehalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;
(ii) The management has represented, that, tothe best of its knowledge and belief, no fundshave been received by the company fromany person or entity, including foreign entity("Funding Party"), with the understanding,whether recorded in writing or otherwise,that the company shall, whether, directly orindirectly, lend or invest in other persons orentities identified in any manner whatsoever
by or on behalf of the Funding Party("Ultimate Beneficiaries") or provide anyguarantee, security or the like on behalf ofthe Ultimate Beneficiaries;
(iii) Based on the audit procedures that havebeen considered reasonable and appropriatein the circumstances, nothing has come toour notice that has caused us to believe thatthe representations under sub-clause (i) and(ii) of Rule 11(e), as provided under (a) and (b)above, contain any material mis-statement.
(e) The company has not paid any dividendduring the year.
(f) Based on our examination which included testchecks, the Company has used accountingsoftware for maintaining its books of accounts,which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log)facility and the same has operated throughout theyear for all transactions recorded in the software.Further during the course of our audit we did notcome across any instance of audit trail featurebeing tampered with. Additionally the audit trailhas been preserved by the company as per thestatutory requirements of record retention.
For G BALU ASSOCIATES LLP
Chartered AccountantsFRN:000376S/S200073
Sd/-
Place: Bengaluru CA R. RAVISHANKAR
Date: 28-05-2025 Partner
UDIN: 25026819BMHBRT4356 Membership No.:026819